<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Migrating to Open Source GIS on the Desktop</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Realms of GIS and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What&#8217;s Holding Back the Adoption of Open Source GIS on the Desktop? &#171; Spatial Galaxy</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-68095</link>
		<dc:creator>What&#8217;s Holding Back the Adoption of Open Source GIS on the Desktop? &#171; Spatial Galaxy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 05:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-68095</guid>
		<description>[...] Spatial Galaxy Exploring the Realms of GIS and Other Stuff      &#171; Migrating to Open Source GIS on the Desktop [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Spatial Galaxy Exploring the Realms of GIS and Other Stuff      &laquo; Migrating to Open Source GIS on the Desktop [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66878</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 14:52:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66878</guid>
		<description>If the migration is based on a cost issue: I feel a great solution is TatukGIS.  Although not Open Source the tools they include with their Editor are outstanding!  I also use their development language to create our own in house GIS applications in addition to client applications.  It has the ability to connect to any GIS data source: shapefile, ESRI geodatabase, DWG, etc.  But when it comes to open: uDig is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the migration is based on a cost issue: I feel a great solution is TatukGIS.  Although not Open Source the tools they include with their Editor are outstanding!  I also use their development language to create our own in house GIS applications in addition to client applications.  It has the ability to connect to any GIS data source: shapefile, ESRI geodatabase, DWG, etc.  But when it comes to open: uDig is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sherman</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66859</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66859</guid>
		<description>@Jody,
Good point, I forgot about adding Jump and cousins...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jody,<br />
Good point, I forgot about adding Jump and cousins&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jody</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66858</link>
		<dc:creator>Jody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66858</guid>
		<description>I actually keep breaking out JUMP (the original) for the excellent data cleaning tools (that as far as I know have not been ported to open jump).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually keep breaking out JUMP (the original) for the excellent data cleaning tools (that as far as I know have not been ported to open jump).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sherman</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66854</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66854</guid>
		<description>@Terry:

Agreed, there are a lot of other apps, but my focus in this case was on desktop GIS rather than the server side...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Terry:</p>
<p>Agreed, there are a lot of other apps, but my focus in this case was on desktop GIS rather than the server side&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66853</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:50:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66853</guid>
		<description>I use a combination of proprietary and open source applications.  In the proprietary camp, I actually find myself using ArcView more often than ArcGIS.  The latter&#039;s just too damn bloated to be of any real use, and the functions that used to be its sphere of influence are now done just as well (and usually faster) by open source apps.  Besides - shapefiles (as archaic and stupid as they are) are an open format, while geodatabases are not.

I feel I should point out, though, that I failed to participate in your poll, simply because the choices were too few.  There&#039;s a LOT of open source software out there, especially if you&#039;re producing maps for the web.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I use a combination of proprietary and open source applications.  In the proprietary camp, I actually find myself using ArcView more often than ArcGIS.  The latter&#8217;s just too damn bloated to be of any real use, and the functions that used to be its sphere of influence are now done just as well (and usually faster) by open source apps.  Besides &#8211; shapefiles (as archaic and stupid as they are) are an open format, while geodatabases are not.</p>
<p>I feel I should point out, though, that I failed to participate in your poll, simply because the choices were too few.  There&#8217;s a LOT of open source software out there, especially if you&#8217;re producing maps for the web.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Sherman</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66849</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Sherman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66849</guid>
		<description>Multiple selections are now possible---</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Multiple selections are now possible&#8212;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexandre Leroux</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2009/11/20/migrating-to-open-source-gis-on-the-desktop/comment-page-1/#comment-66848</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexandre Leroux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/?p=103#comment-66848</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t select multiple items and vote despite the &quot;check all that apply&quot; instructions. There&#039;s something not working right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t select multiple items and vote despite the &#8220;check all that apply&#8221; instructions. There&#8217;s something not working right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
