<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QGIS MapServer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spatialgalaxy.net/2007/05/11/qgis-mapserver/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2007/05/11/qgis-mapserver/</link>
	<description>Exploring the Realms of GIS and Other Stuff</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:18:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Milo van der Linden</title>
		<link>http://spatialgalaxy.net/2007/05/11/qgis-mapserver/comment-page-1/#comment-11989</link>
		<dc:creator>Milo van der Linden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spatialgalaxy.net/2007/05/11/qgis-mapserver/#comment-11989</guid>
		<description>Why have a QGIS Mapserver when the UMN Mapserver is so good, so stable and so well developed? Let qGIS focus on desktop GIS, then end users will get the best of both worlds!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why have a QGIS Mapserver when the UMN Mapserver is so good, so stable and so well developed? Let qGIS focus on desktop GIS, then end users will get the best of both worlds!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
